Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Data-driven distributionally robust MPC for constrained stochastic systems

Systems and Control · Submitted 4 Mar 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The resulting control scheme acts as a robust controller when little data is available and converges to the certainty equivalent controller when a large sample count implies high confidence in the estimated second moment.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2103.03006 (version 3)
Pith IDS3663XJE, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationPanagiotis Patrinos, Peter Coppens. "Data-driven distributionally robust MPC for constrained stochastic systems." arXiv:2103.03006 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/S3663XJE
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,493 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.16 · states limitation 0.34 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.16 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.26 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v3. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

In this paper we introduce a novel approach to distributionally robust optimal control that supports online learning of the ambiguity set, while guaranteeing recursive feasibility. We introduce conic representable risk, which is useful to derive tractable reformulations of distributionally robust optimization problems. Specifically, to illustrate the techniques introduced, we utilize risk measures constructed based on data-driven ambiguity sets, constraining the second moment of the random disturbance. In the optimal control setting, such moment-based risk measures lead to tractable optimal controllers when combined with affine disturbance feedback. Assumptions on the constraints are given that guarantee recursive feasibility. The resulting control scheme acts as a robust controller when little data is available and converges to the certainty equivalent controller when a large sample count implies high confidence in the estimated second moment. This is illustrated in a numerical experiment.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 In this paper we introduce a novel approach to distributionally robust optimal control that supports online learning of the ambiguity set, while guaranteeing recursive feasibility. contribution 1.00 0.94 0.42 asserted 1.00
s1 We introduce conic representable risk, which is useful to derive tractable reformulations of distributionally robust optimization problems. contribution 0.97 0.91 0.07 asserted 0.99
s2 Specifically, to illustrate the techniques introduced, we utilize risk measures constructed based on data-driven ambiguity sets, constraining the second moment of the random disturbance. method 0.92 0.80 0.06 asserted 0.95
s3 In the optimal control setting, such moment-based risk measures lead to tractable optimal controllers when combined with affine disturbance feedback. result 0.46 0.62 0.10 asserted 0.95
s4 Assumptions on the constraints are given that guarantee recursive feasibility. method 0.62 0.70 0.07 asserted 0.98
s5 The resulting control scheme acts as a robust controller when little data is available and converges to the certainty equivalent controller when a large sample count implies high confidence in the estimated second moment. interpretation 0.62 0.82 0.43 asserted 1.00
s6 This is illustrated in a numerical experiment. result 0.45 0.90 0.04 asserted 0.98

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 0.52.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v3
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

In this paper we introduce a novel approach to distributionally robust optimal control that supports online learning of the ambiguity set, while guaranteeing recursive feasibility. We introduce conic representable risk, which is useful to derive tractable reformulations of distributionally robust optimization problems. Specifically, to illustrate the techniques introduced, we utilize risk measures constructed based on data-driven ambiguity sets, constraining the second moment of the random disturbance. In the optimal control setting, such moment-based risk measures lead to tractable optimal controllers when combined with affine disturbance feedback. Assumptions on the constraints are given that guarantee recursive feasibility. The resulting control scheme acts as a robust controller when little data is available and converges to the certainty equivalent controller when a large sample count implies high confidence in the estimated second moment. This is illustrated in a numerical experiment.

Human review
How the literature uses it

4 arXiv papers cite this in 6 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Uses its method or tool 1 paper
Cites it as background 2 papers

What it cites · 5 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Compares with 1 paper
  • Similar results were achieved in [ref] for a tube-based approach with Wasserstein ambiguity, the radius of which is not data-driven; in [ref] for relaxed, robust constraints; in [ref] for moment-based ambiguity which is not data-driven and does not guarantee recursive feasibility; and [ref] for discrete distributions.

    Stochastic MPC with Distributionally Robust Chance Constraints · Introduction · 1.00

Cites as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.