Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Detecting Inappropriate Messages on Sensitive Topics that Could Harm a Company's Reputation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.05345 v1 pith:V7LFLNNO submitted 2021-03-09 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords inappropriatedatasetinappropriatenesstopicstoxictoxicitydatadiscussion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Not all topics are equally "flammable" in terms of toxicity: a calm discussion of turtles or fishing less often fuels inappropriate toxic dialogues than a discussion of politics or sexual minorities. We define a set of sensitive topics that can yield inappropriate and toxic messages and describe the methodology of collecting and labeling a dataset for appropriateness. While toxicity in user-generated data is well-studied, we aim at defining a more fine-grained notion of inappropriateness. The core of inappropriateness is that it can harm the reputation of a speaker. This is different from toxicity in two respects: (i) inappropriateness is topic-related, and (ii) inappropriate message is not toxic but still unacceptable. We collect and release two datasets for Russian: a topic-labeled dataset and an appropriateness-labeled dataset. We also release pre-trained classification models trained on this data.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools