Removing Gamification: A Research Agenda

Katie Seaborn

RECORD

Removing Gamification: A Research Agenda

Katie Seaborn

Human-Computer Interaction · Submitted 10 Mar 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Significantly, insufficient reporting, methodological weaknesses, limited measures, and superficial interpretations of "negative" results prevent firm conclusions.

how it is stated · asserted 0.98 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗

Cite ▾

Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,686 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.45 · states limitation 0.71 · human participants 0.44 · controlled comparison 0.13 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.92 · compares with prior results 0.21 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; show every role.

The effect of removing gamification elements from interactive systems has been a long-standing question in gamification research. Early work and foundational theories raised concerns about the endurance of positive effects and the emergence of negative ones. Yet, nearly a decade later, no work to date has sought consensus on these matters. Here, I offer a rapid review on the state of the art and what is known about the impact of removing gamification. A small corpus of 8 papers published between 2012 and 2020 were found. Findings suggest a mix of positive and negative effects related to removing gamification. Significantly, insufficient reporting, methodological weaknesses, limited measures, and superficial interpretations of "negative" results prevent firm conclusions. I offer a research agenda towards better understanding the nature of gamification removal. I end with a call for empirical and theoretical work on illuminating the effects that may linger after systems are un-gamified.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#	sentence	role	the authors' own work	states the main conclusion	strength
s0	The effect of removing gamification elements from interactive systems has been a long-standing question in gamification research.	background 1.00	0.03	0.03	asserted 0.96
s1	Early work and foundational theories raised concerns about the endurance of positive effects and the emergence of negative ones.	background 1.00	0.03	0.03	asserted 0.75
s2	Yet, nearly a decade later, no work to date has sought consensus on these matters.	gap 0.99	0.13	0.05	asserted 1.00
s3	Here, I offer a rapid review on the state of the art and what is known about the impact of removing gamification.	contribution 0.99	0.86	0.06	asserted 0.79
s4	A small corpus of 8 papers published between 2012 and 2020 were found.	method 0.94	0.91	0.03	asserted 1.00
s5	Findings suggest a mix of positive and negative effects related to removing gamification.	result 0.99	0.57	0.39	hedged possibility 0.93
s6	Significantly, insufficient reporting, methodological weaknesses, limited measures, and superficial interpretations of "negative" results prevent firm conclusions.	result 0.41	0.48	0.64	asserted 0.98
s7	I offer a research agenda towards better understanding the nature of gamification removal.	future work 0.85	0.75	0.11	asserted 0.72
s8	I end with a call for empirical and theoretical work on illuminating the effects that may linger after systems are un-gamified.	future work 1.00	0.23	0.10	hedged possibility 0.79

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 0.99 · evidence from literature 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read

arXiv listing abstract v2

not examined

full text
figures and tables
references and citing sentences
relations to other papers

levels run

P abstract

not run

S sections
T body sentences
C citations
R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper

Original abstract

The effect of removing gamification elements from interactive systems has been a long-standing question in gamification research. Early work and foundational theories raised concerns about the endurance of positive effects and the emergence of negative ones. Yet, nearly a decade later, no work to date has sought consensus on these matters. Here, I offer a rapid review on the state of the art and what is known about the impact of removing gamification. A small corpus of 8 papers published between 2012 and 2020 were found. Findings suggest a mix of positive and negative effects related to removing gamification. Significantly, insufficient reporting, methodological weaknesses, limited measures, and superficial interpretations of "negative" results prevent firm conclusions. I offer a research agenda towards better understanding the nature of gamification removal. I end with a call for empirical and theoretical work on illuminating the effects that may linger after systems are un-gamified.

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.