Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Adapting User Interfaces with Model-based Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.06807 v1 pith:GOUNBUXY submitted 2021-03-11 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords userchangeseffectsadaptationadaptingadaptiveinterfaceslearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Adapting an interface requires taking into account both the positive and negative effects that changes may have on the user. A carelessly picked adaptation may impose high costs to the user -- for example, due to surprise or relearning effort -- or "trap" the process to a suboptimal design immaturely. However, effects on users are hard to predict as they depend on factors that are latent and evolve over the course of interaction. We propose a novel approach for adaptive user interfaces that yields a conservative adaptation policy: It finds beneficial changes when there are such and avoids changes when there are none. Our model-based reinforcement learning method plans sequences of adaptations and consults predictive HCI models to estimate their effects. We present empirical and simulation results from the case of adaptive menus, showing that the method outperforms both a non-adaptive and a frequency-based policy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PromptCanvas: Composable Prompting Workspaces Using Dynamic Widgets for Exploration and Iteration in Creative Writing

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A widget-based canvas for AI writing prompts was rated as more creativity-supportive and less mentally demanding than a conversational chat UI in a lab study (N=18) and a follow-up field study (N=10).

Pith tools