Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Quantifying the Efficacy of Logic Locking Methods

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.06990 v1 pith:7W2GI4XY submitted 2021-03-11 cs.CR

classification cs.CR
keywords lockinglogictechniquescircuitscorruptionefficacymetricsadding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The outsourced manufacturing of integrated circuits has increased the risk of intellectual property theft. In response, logic locking techniques have been developed for protecting designs by adding programmable elements to the circuit. These techniques differ significantly in both overhead and resistance to various attacks, leaving designers unable to discern their efficacy. To overcome this critical impediment for the adoption of logic locking, we propose two metrics, key corruption and minimum corruption, that capture the goals of locking under different attack scenarios. We develop a flow for approximating these metrics on generic locked circuits and evaluate several locking techniques.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools