Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

What is Leading Order for LFV in SMEFT?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.07212 v1 pith:Z7WGDJQJ submitted 2021-03-12 hep-ph

classification hep-ph
keywords scalesdimensioneffectsflavour-changingone-looprgessensitivesmall
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Upcoming searches for lepton flavour change (LFV) aim to probe New Physics(NP) scales up to $ \sim 10^4$ TeV, implying that they will be sensitive to NP at lower scales that is suppressed by loops or small couplings. We suppose that the NP responsable for LFV is beyond the reach of the LHC and can be parametrised in Effective Field Theory, introduce a small power-counting parameter \`a la Cabibbo-Wolfenstein, and assess whether the existing dimension six operator basis and one-loop RGEs provide a good approximation for LFV. We find that mu to e flavour-changing observables can be sensitive to a few dozen dimension eight operators, and to some effects of two-loop anomalous dimensions, for NP scales below 20-100 TeV. We also explore the effect of some simplifying assumptions in the one-loop RGEs, such as neglecting flavour-changing effects.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Guide to Functional Methods Beyond One-Loop Order

    hep-ph 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Functional methods are generalized to two-loop EFT matching and running with manifest gauge covariance, and the hard-region matching formula is proven to all loop orders.

Pith tools