Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Adversarial YOLO: Defense Human Detection Patch Attacks via Detecting Adversarial Patches

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.08860 v1 pith:GXNWBSD3 submitted 2021-03-16 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords ad-yoloattackspatchdetectionadversarialhumandefensefacing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

The security of object detection systems has attracted increasing attention, especially when facing adversarial patch attacks. Since patch attacks change the pixels in a restricted area on objects, they are easy to implement in the physical world, especially for attacking human detection systems. The existing defenses against patch attacks are mostly applied for image classification problems and have difficulty resisting human detection attacks. Towards this critical issue, we propose an efficient and effective plug-in defense component on the YOLO detection system, which we name Ad-YOLO. The main idea is to add a patch class on the YOLO architecture, which has a negligible inference increment. Thus, Ad-YOLO is expected to directly detect both the objects of interest and adversarial patches. To the best of our knowledge, our approach is the first defense strategy against human detection attacks. We investigate Ad-YOLO's performance on the YOLOv2 baseline. To improve the ability of Ad-YOLO to detect variety patches, we first use an adversarial training process to develop a patch dataset based on the Inria dataset, which we name Inria-Patch. Then, we train Ad-YOLO by a combination of Pascal VOC, Inria, and Inria-Patch datasets. With a slight drop of $0.70\%$ mAP on VOC 2007 test set, Ad-YOLO achieves $80.31\%$ AP of persons, which highly outperforms $33.93\%$ AP for YOLOv2 when facing white-box patch attacks. Furthermore, compared with YOLOv2, the results facing a physical-world attack are also included to demonstrate Ad-YOLO's excellent generalization ability.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PBCAT: Patch-based composite adversarial training against physically realizable attacks on object detection

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A composite adversarial training method that combines small-area gradient-guided patches with imperceptible global perturbations improves object detector robustness against both adversarial patches and adversarial tex...

  2. Cyber-Physical Co-Simulation of Load Frequency Control under Load-Altering Attacks

    eess.SY 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    This paper presents an open-source cyber-physical co-simulation framework for analyzing dynamic load-altering attacks against load frequency control and under-frequency load shedding in power grids.

Pith tools