REVIEW 1 cited by
Improved Approximation Algorithms for 2-Dimensional Knapsack: Packing into Multiple L-Shapes, Spirals, and More
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Improved Approximation Algorithms for 2-Dimensional Knapsack: Packing into Multiple L-Shapes, Spirals, and More
read the original abstract
In the \textsc{2-Dimensional Knapsack} problem (2DK) we are given a square knapsack and a collection of $n$ rectangular items with integer sizes and profits. Our goal is to find the most profitable subset of items that can be packed non-overlappingly into the knapsack. The currently best known polynomial-time approximation factor for 2DK is $17/9+\varepsilon<1.89$ and there is a $(3/2+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm if we are allowed to rotate items by 90 degrees~{[}G\'alvez et al., FOCS 2017{]}. In this paper, we give $(4/3+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithms in polynomial time for both cases, assuming that all input data are {integers polynomially bounded in $n$}. G\'alvez et al.'s algorithm for 2DK partitions the knapsack into a constant number of rectangular regions plus \emph{one} L-shaped region and packs items into those {in a structured way}. We generalize this approach by allowing up to a \emph{constant} number of {\emph{more general}} regions that can have the shape of an L, a U, a Z, a spiral, and more, and therefore obtain an improved approximation ratio. {In particular, we present an algorithm that computes the essentially optimal structured packing into these regions. }
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Near-Tight Approximation Algorithms for Bottleneck Multiple Knapsack Problems
Near-tight (2/3-ε) approximation for identical-capacity bottleneck multiple knapsack and (1/2-ε) for arbitrary capacities, with matching inapproximability.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.