REVIEW 2 cited by
Deep Learning for Exotic Option Valuation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
A common approach to valuing exotic options involves choosing a model and then determining its parameters to fit the volatility surface as closely as possible. We refer to this as the model calibration approach (MCA). A disadvantage of MCA is that some information in the volatility surface is lost during the calibration process and the prices of exotic options will not in general be consistent with those of plain vanilla options. We consider an alternative approach where the structure of the user's preferred model is preserved but points on the volatility are features input to a neural network. We refer to this as the volatility feature approach (VFA) model. We conduct experiments showing that VFA can be expected to outperform MCA for the volatility surfaces encountered in practice. Once the upfront computational time has been invested in developing the neural network, the valuation of exotic options using VFA is very fast.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Deep Learning Option Pricing with Market Implied Volatility Surfaces
A VAE-compressed volatility surface plus a small neural network can approximate QuantLib prices for American puts and arithmetic Asian options in a single forward pass.
-
Empirical Models of the Time Evolution of SPX Option Prices
A small neural network trained on 30 years of SPX put options outperforms Black-Scholes in MAPE, but its outputs violate the paper's own no-arbitrage checks in 5 to 17 percent of cases.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.