REVIEW 2 cited by
Understanding the role of importance weighting for deep learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
The recent paper by Byrd & Lipton (2019), based on empirical observations, raises a major concern on the impact of importance weighting for the over-parameterized deep learning models. They observe that as long as the model can separate the training data, the impact of importance weighting diminishes as the training proceeds. Nevertheless, there lacks a rigorous characterization of this phenomenon. In this paper, we provide formal characterizations and theoretical justifications on the role of importance weighting with respect to the implicit bias of gradient descent and margin-based learning theory. We reveal both the optimization dynamics and generalization performance under deep learning models. Our work not only explains the various novel phenomenons observed for importance weighting in deep learning, but also extends to the studies where the weights are being optimized as part of the model, which applies to a number of topics under active research.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Thumb on the Scale: Optimal Loss Weighting in Last Layer Retraining
For square-loss weighted ERM in the proportional asymptotic regime, the class weight that equalizes per-class errors is ρ̃ = π−/π+ + (π−/π+ − 1) δ/(2π+ − δ), exceeding the ratio of priors and growing with δ.
-
CaTE Data Curation for Trustworthy AI
A synthesis of data curation practices for trustworthy AI, framed around an actionable definition of trustworthiness and a decision tree.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.