REVIEW 1 cited by
Exploring Targeted Universal Adversarial Perturbations to End-to-end ASR Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Although end-to-end automatic speech recognition (e2e ASR) models are widely deployed in many applications, there have been very few studies to understand models' robustness against adversarial perturbations. In this paper, we explore whether a targeted universal perturbation vector exists for e2e ASR models. Our goal is to find perturbations that can mislead the models to predict the given targeted transcript such as "thank you" or empty string on any input utterance. We study two different attacks, namely additive and prepending perturbations, and their performances on the state-of-the-art LAS, CTC and RNN-T models. We find that LAS is the most vulnerable to perturbations among the three models. RNN-T is more robust against additive perturbations, especially on long utterances. And CTC is robust against both additive and prepending perturbations. To attack RNN-T, we find prepending perturbation is more effective than the additive perturbation, and can mislead the models to predict the same short target on utterances of arbitrary length.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models
Gradient and greedy search over token suffixes produces universal, transferable adversarial prompts that elicit objectionable outputs from aligned models including black-box commercial systems.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.