Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Certified Control: An Architecture for Verifiable Safety of Autonomous Vehicles

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.06178 v1 pith:3KJ6NXFW submitted 2021-03-29 cs.RO cs.LOcs.SEcs.SYeess.SY

classification cs.ROcs.LOcs.SEcs.SYeess.SY
keywords safetycontrolmonitorarchitecturecertifiedcertificateruntimeanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Widespread adoption of autonomous cars will require greater confidence in their safety than is currently possible. Certified control is a new safety architecture whose goal is two-fold: to achieve a very high level of safety, and to provide a framework for justifiable confidence in that safety. The key idea is a runtime monitor that acts, along with sensor hardware and low-level control and actuators, as a small trusted base, ensuring the safety of the system as a whole. Unfortunately, in current systems complex perception makes the verification even of a runtime monitor challenging. Unlike traditional runtime monitoring, therefore, a certified control monitor does not perform perception and analysis itself. Instead, the main controller assembles evidence that the proposed action is safe into a certificate that is then checked independently by the monitor. This exploits the classic gap between the costs of finding and checking. The controller is assigned the task of finding the certificate, and can thus use the most sophisticated algorithms available (including learning-enabled software); the monitor is assigned only the task of checking, and can thus run quickly and be smaller and formally verifiable. This paper explains the key ideas of certified control and illustrates them with a certificate for LiDAR data and its formal verification. It shows how the architecture dramatically reduces the amount of code to be verified, providing an end-to-end safety analysis that would likely not be achievable in a traditional architecture.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Using Formal Models, Safety Shields and Certified Control to Validate AI-Based Train Systems

    cs.LO 2024-11 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    A demonstrator couples a formal B model, a real YOLO perception AI, and a certified-control checker to enable runtime monitoring and Monte Carlo safety validation of an AI-based train system.

Pith tools