REVIEW 1 cited by
Are Multilingual BERT models robust? A Case Study on Adversarial Attacks for Multilingual Question Answering
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Recent approaches have exploited weaknesses in monolingual question answering (QA) models by adding adversarial statements to the passage. These attacks caused a reduction in state-of-the-art performance by almost 50%. In this paper, we are the first to explore and successfully attack a multilingual QA (MLQA) system pre-trained on multilingual BERT using several attack strategies for the adversarial statement reducing performance by as much as 85%. We show that the model gives priority to English and the language of the question regardless of the other languages in the QA pair. Further, we also show that adding our attack strategies during training helps alleviate the attacks.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Deceiving Question-Answering Models: A Hybrid Word-Level Adversarial Approach
QA-Attack fuses attention-based and removal-based word ranking to locate vulnerable words in question-answering contexts and substitutes synonyms, fooling T5, LongT5, and BERT QA models.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.