REVIEW 1 cited by
On the Impact of Word Error Rate on Acoustic-Linguistic Speech Emotion Recognition: An Update for the Deep Learning Era
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Text encodings from automatic speech recognition (ASR) transcripts and audio representations have shown promise in speech emotion recognition (SER) ever since. Yet, it is challenging to explain the effect of each information stream on the SER systems. Further, more clarification is required for analysing the impact of ASR's word error rate (WER) on linguistic emotion recognition per se and in the context of fusion with acoustic information exploitation in the age of deep ASR systems. In order to tackle the above issues, we create transcripts from the original speech by applying three modern ASR systems, including an end-to-end model trained with recurrent neural network-transducer loss, a model with connectionist temporal classification loss, and a wav2vec framework for self-supervised learning. Afterwards, we use pre-trained textual models to extract text representations from the ASR outputs and the gold standard. For extraction and learning of acoustic speech features, we utilise openSMILE, openXBoW, DeepSpectrum, and auDeep. Finally, we conduct decision-level fusion on both information streams -- acoustics and linguistics. Using the best development configuration, we achieve state-of-the-art unweighted average recall values of $73.6\,\%$ and $73.8\,\%$ on the speaker-independent development and test partitions of IEMOCAP, respectively.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
"How to Explore Biases in Speech Emotion AI with Users?" A Speech-Emotion-Acting Study Exploring Age and Language Biases
In a 24-person Danish study, a speech emotion recognition model showed no significant age or language differences in recognizing deliberately acted happy, sad, angry, and calm speech, though high-arousal emotions were...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.