Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On the Impact of Word Error Rate on Acoustic-Linguistic Speech Emotion Recognition: An Update for the Deep Learning Era

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.10121 v1 pith:XYZ236SV submitted 2021-04-20 cs.SD cs.CLeess.AS

classification cs.SDcs.CLeess.AS
keywords speechrecognitionemotioninformationlearningsystemsacousticdeep
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Text encodings from automatic speech recognition (ASR) transcripts and audio representations have shown promise in speech emotion recognition (SER) ever since. Yet, it is challenging to explain the effect of each information stream on the SER systems. Further, more clarification is required for analysing the impact of ASR's word error rate (WER) on linguistic emotion recognition per se and in the context of fusion with acoustic information exploitation in the age of deep ASR systems. In order to tackle the above issues, we create transcripts from the original speech by applying three modern ASR systems, including an end-to-end model trained with recurrent neural network-transducer loss, a model with connectionist temporal classification loss, and a wav2vec framework for self-supervised learning. Afterwards, we use pre-trained textual models to extract text representations from the ASR outputs and the gold standard. For extraction and learning of acoustic speech features, we utilise openSMILE, openXBoW, DeepSpectrum, and auDeep. Finally, we conduct decision-level fusion on both information streams -- acoustics and linguistics. Using the best development configuration, we achieve state-of-the-art unweighted average recall values of $73.6\,\%$ and $73.8\,\%$ on the speaker-independent development and test partitions of IEMOCAP, respectively.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. "How to Explore Biases in Speech Emotion AI with Users?" A Speech-Emotion-Acting Study Exploring Age and Language Biases

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a 24-person Danish study, a speech emotion recognition model showed no significant age or language differences in recognizing deliberately acted happy, sad, angry, and calm speech, though high-arousal emotions were...

Pith tools