REVIEW 3 cited by
Accented Speech Recognition: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems generalize poorly on accented speech. The phonetic and linguistic variability of accents present hard challenges for ASR systems today in both data collection and modeling strategies. The resulting bias in ASR performance across accents comes at a cost to both users and providers of ASR. We present a survey of current promising approaches to accented speech recognition and highlight the key challenges in the space. Approaches mostly focus on single model generalization and accent feature engineering. Among the challenges, lack of a standard benchmark makes research and comparison especially difficult.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Effects of Speaker Count, Duration, and Accent Diversity on Zero-Shot Accent Robustness in Low-Resource ASR
For a fixed training budget, low-resource ASR models handle unseen accents best when trained on more speakers with less audio each, and accent diversity in training gives minimal extra benefit.
-
Discrete Tokens Exhibit Interlanguage Speech Intelligibility Benefit: an Analytical Study Towards Accent-robust ASR Only with Native Speech Data
Discrete speech tokens trained on a speaker's first language improve ASR accuracy on that speaker's accented English, reproducing the interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit in machines.
-
A Tactical Behaviour Recognition Framework Based on Causal Multimodal Reasoning: A Study on Covert Audio-Video Analysis Combining GAN Structure Enhancement and Phonetic Accent Modelling
TACTIC-GRAPHS is a proposed multimodal graph reasoning framework for tactical threat detection; performance claims are unsupported and internally inconsistent.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.