REVIEW 3 cited by
Double copy structure of parity-violating CFT correlators
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We show that general parity-violating 3d conformal field theories show a double copy structure for momentum space 3-point functions of conserved currents, stress tensor and marginal scalar operators. Splitting up the CFT correlator into two parts - called homogeneous and non-homogeneous - we show that double copy relations exist for each part separately. We arrive at similar conclusions regarding double copy structures using tree-level correlators of massless fields in $dS_4$. We also discuss the flat space limit of these correlators. We further extend the double copy analysis to correlators involving higher-spin conserved currents, which suggests that the spin-$s$ current correlator can be thought of as $s$ copies of the spin one current correlator.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
From chiral to conformal anomalies: a double copy perspective for CFT correlators
Squaring the chiral-anomaly three-current correlator, in its five-dimensional flat-space limit, reproduces the conformal-anomaly contribution to the stress-tensor three-point function.
-
An Ode to the Penrose and Witten transforms in Twistor space for 3D CFT
The authors show that the infinity twistor must be added to twistor-space invariants to describe general primary operators in 3D CFTs, and they derive the corresponding Penrose, Witten, and super-Penrose transforms.
-
Lectures on the Spinor and Twistor Formalism in 3D Conformal Field Theory
Lecture notes recapping off-shell spinor helicity, twistor, and super-twistor methods for 3d CFT correlators, with 55 exercises and no substantial new research result.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.