REVIEW 2 cited by
Unitarity Bounds for Semileptonic Decays in Lattice QCD
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this work we discuss in detail the non-perturbative determination of the momentum dependence of the form factors entering in semileptonic decays using unitarity and analyticity constraints. The method contains several new elements with respect to previous proposals and allows to extract, using suitable two-point functions computed non-perturbatively, the form factors at low momentum transfer $q^2$ from those computed explicitly on the lattice at large $q^2$, without any assumption about their $q^2$-dependence. The approach will be very useful for exclusive semileptonic $B$-meson decays, where the direct calculation of the form factors at low $q^2$ is particularly difficult due to large statistical fluctuations and discretisation effects. As a testing ground we apply our approach to the semileptonic $D \to K \ell \nu_\ell$ decay, where we can compare the results of the unitarity approach to the explicit direct lattice calculation of the form factors in the full $q^2$-range. We show that the method is very effective and that it allows to compute the form factors with rather good precision.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Dispersive Look at Rare $B$-meson Semileptonic Decays
Lattice-only Dispersive Matrix form factors enlarge large-recoil uncertainties and, with new angular data, favour long-distance hadronic effects over a short-distance C9 New Physics shift.
-
$V_{cb}$ puzzle in semi-leptonic $B\to D^*$ decays revisited
Using the latest Belle and Belle II data, CLN, BGL, and HQET fits give consistent exclusive |Vcb| values near 39.7 times 10^-3, confirming the persistent 2 to 3 sigma gap with the inclusive value.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.