Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Cyclic Arbitrage in Decentralized Exchanges

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.02784 v3 pith:YQA2QGEM submitted 2021-04-21 q-fin.TR cs.CEcs.CR

classification q-fin.TRcs.CEcs.CR
keywords cyclicarbitragearbitragestradersatomiccryptocurrenciesdecentralizeddexes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Decentralized Exchanges (DEXes) enable users to create markets for exchanging any pair of cryptocurrencies. The direct exchange rate of two tokens may not match the cross-exchange rate in the market, and such price discrepancies open up arbitrage possibilities with trading through different cryptocurrencies cyclically. In this paper, we conduct a systematic investigation on cyclic arbitrages in DEXes. We propose a theoretical framework for studying cyclic arbitrage. With our framework, we analyze the profitability conditions and optimal trading strategies of cyclic transactions. We further examine exploitable arbitrage opportunities and the market size of cyclic arbitrages with transaction-level data of Uniswap V2. We find that traders have executed 292,606 cyclic arbitrages over eleven months and exploited more than 138 million USD in revenue. However, the revenue of the most profitable unexploited opportunity is persistently higher than 1 ETH (4,000 USD), which indicates that DEX markets may not be efficient enough. By analyzing how traders implement cyclic arbitrages, we find that traders can utilize smart contracts to issue atomic transactions and the atomic implementations could mitigate users' financial loss in cyclic arbitrage from the price impact.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optimistic MEV in Ethereum Layer 2s: Why Blockspace Is Always in Demand

    cs.CE 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Optimistic MEV, mostly non-trading cyclic arbitrage probes, accounts for 51% of on-chain gas on Base and 55% on Optimism in Q1 2025, versus 7% on Arbitrum.

Pith tools