Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Norm rigidity for arithmetic and profinite groups

Group Theory · Submitted 10 May 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We show that if ${\rm{SL}}_n(A)$ has bounded elementary generation then every conjugation-invariant norm on it is either discrete or precompact.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2105.04125 (version 6)
Pith IDSVSW3BK2, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationLeonid Polterovich, Yehuda Shalom, Zvi Shem-Tov. "Norm rigidity for arithmetic and profinite groups." arXiv:2105.04125 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/SVSW3BK2
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,975 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.43 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.01 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.09 · compares with prior results 0.92 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v6. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Let $A$ be a commutative ring, and assume every non-trivial ideal of $A$ has finite-index. We show that if ${\rm{SL}}_n(A)$ has bounded elementary generation then every conjugation-invariant norm on it is either discrete or precompact. If $G$ is any group satisfying this dichotomy we say that $G$ has the \emph{dichotomy property}. We relate the dichotomy property, as well as some natural variants of it, to other rigidity results in the theory of arithmetic and profinite groups such as the celebrated normal subgroup theorem of Margulis and the seminal work of Nikolov and Segal. As a consequence we derive constraints to the possible approximations of certain non residually finite central extensions of arithmetic groups, which we hope might have further applications in the study of sofic groups. In the last section we provide several open problems for further research.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Let $A$ be a commutative ring, and assume every non-trivial ideal of $A$ has finite-index. background 0.99 0.06 0.02 asserted 0.84
s1 We show that if ${\rm{SL}}_n(A)$ has bounded elementary generation then every conjugation-invariant norm on it is either discrete or precompact. result 0.98 0.95 0.89 asserted 1.00
s2 If $G$ is any group satisfying this dichotomy we say that $G$ has the \emph{dichotomy property}. background 0.39 0.60 0.05 asserted 0.83
s3 We relate the dichotomy property, as well as some natural variants of it, to other rigidity results in the theory of arithmetic and profinite groups such as the celebrated normal subgroup theorem of Margulis and the seminal work of Nikolov and Segal. contribution 0.57 0.77 0.06 asserted 0.98
s4 As a consequence we derive constraints to the possible approximations of certain non residually finite central extensions of arithmetic groups, which we hope might have further applications in the study of sofic groups. result 0.63 0.94 0.09 asserted 0.58
s5 In the last section we provide several open problems for further research. future work 1.00 0.79 0.02 asserted 0.88

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v6
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Let $A$ be a commutative ring, and assume every non-trivial ideal of $A$ has finite-index. We show that if ${\rm{SL}}_n(A)$ has bounded elementary generation then every conjugation-invariant norm on it is either discrete or precompact. If $G$ is any group satisfying this dichotomy we say that $G$ has the \emph{dichotomy property}. We relate the dichotomy property, as well as some natural variants of it, to other rigidity results in the theory of arithmetic and profinite groups such as the celebrated normal subgroup theorem of Margulis and the seminal work of Nikolov and Segal. As a consequence we derive constraints to the possible approximations of certain non residually finite central extensions of arithmetic groups, which we hope might have further applications in the study of sofic groups. In the last section we provide several open problems for further research.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 3 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 3 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
Cites as background 1 paper
  • Two especially challenging cases seem to stand out: The first is that when $$ is anisotropic over $K$, i.e. $Γ$ has no unipotent elements (and is a co-compact lattice in its “natural envelope”; see [ref] for more detalis, as well as a construction of such groups by means of maximal orders in division algebras).

    Introduction to Arithmetic Groups · Questions · 1.00

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.