REVIEW 1 cited by
Improved $(g-2)_\mu$ Measurements and Supersymmetry : Implications for $e^+e^-$ colliders
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
The persistent 3-4$\sigma$ discrepancy between the experimental result from BNL for the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon and its Standard Model (SM) prediction, was confirmed recently by the "MUON G-2" result from Fermilab. The combination of the two measurements yields a deviation of 4.2$\sigma$ from the SM value. Here, we review an analysis of the parameter space of the electroweak (EW) sector of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM), which can provide a suitable explanation of the anomaly while being in full agreement with other latest experimental data like the direct searches for EW particles at the LHC and dark matter (DM) relic density and direct detection constraints. Taking the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) (the lightest neutralino in our case) to be the DM candidate, we discuss the case of a mixed bino/wino LSP, which can account for the full DM relic density of the universe and that of wino and higgsino DM, where we take the relic density only as an upper bound. We observe that an upper limit of ~ 600 GeV can be obtained for the LSP and next-to (N)LSP masses establishing clear search targets for the future HL-LHC EW searches, but in particular for future high-energy $e^+e^-$ colliders, such as the ILC or CLIC.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The LHC sensitivity to weak gauginos in light of the latest muon $g-2$ and dark matter results
In the MSSM, after muon g-2 and dark matter constraints, only bino-like LSPs with wino or slepton coannihilation survive, and a 27 TeV HE-LHC could probe most of the remaining mass range.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.