Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Protein sequence-to-structure learning: Is this the end(-to-end revolution)?

Biomolecules · Submitted 16 May 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In CASP14, deep learning has boosted the field to unanticipated levels reaching near-experimental accuracy.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2105.07407 (version 2)
Pith IDPLNK5EVG, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationArne Elofsson, Elodie Laine, Sergei Grudinin, Stephan Eismann. "Protein sequence-to-structure learning: Is this the end(-to-end revolution)?." arXiv:2105.07407 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/PLNK5EVG
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,413 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.08 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.05 · compares with prior results 0.15 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The potential of deep learning has been recognized in the protein structure prediction community for some time, and became indisputable after CASP13. In CASP14, deep learning has boosted the field to unanticipated levels reaching near-experimental accuracy. This success comes from advances transferred from other machine learning areas, as well as methods specifically designed to deal with protein sequences and structures, and their abstractions. Novel emerging approaches include (i) geometric learning, i.e. learning on representations such as graphs, 3D Voronoi tessellations, and point clouds; (ii) pre-trained protein language models leveraging attention; (iii) equivariant architectures preserving the symmetry of 3D space; (iv) use of large meta-genome databases; (v) combinations of protein representations; (vi) and finally truly end-to-end architectures, i.e. differentiable models starting from a sequence and returning a 3D structure. Here, we provide an overview and our opinion of the novel deep learning approaches developed in the last two years and widely used in CASP14.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The potential of deep learning has been recognized in the protein structure prediction community for some time, and became indisputable after CASP13. background 1.00 0.04 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 In CASP14, deep learning has boosted the field to unanticipated levels reaching near-experimental accuracy. background 0.95 0.06 0.08 asserted 1.00
s2 This success comes from advances transferred from other machine learning areas, as well as methods specifically designed to deal with protein sequences and structures, and their abstractions. background 0.68 0.07 0.07 asserted 1.00
s3 Novel emerging approaches include (i) geometric learning, i.e. learning on representations such as graphs, 3D Voronoi tessellations, and point clouds; (ii) pre-trained protein language models leveraging attention; (iii) equivariant architectures preserving the symmetry of 3D space; (iv) use of large meta-genome databases; (v) combinations of protein representations; (vi) and finally truly end-to-end architectures, i.e. differentiable models starting from a sequence and returning a 3D structure. background 0.90 0.06 0.08 asserted 0.98
s4 Here, we provide an overview and our opinion of the novel deep learning approaches developed in the last two years and widely used in CASP14. contribution 1.00 0.54 0.07 asserted 0.85

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 0.98 · evidence from literature 0.93.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The potential of deep learning has been recognized in the protein structure prediction community for some time, and became indisputable after CASP13. In CASP14, deep learning has boosted the field to unanticipated levels reaching near-experimental accuracy. This success comes from advances transferred from other machine learning areas, as well as methods specifically designed to deal with protein sequences and structures, and their abstractions. Novel emerging approaches include (i) geometric learning, i.e. learning on representations such as graphs, 3D Voronoi tessellations, and point clouds; (ii) pre-trained protein language models leveraging attention; (iii) equivariant architectures preserving the symmetry of 3D space; (iv) use of large meta-genome databases; (v) combinations of protein representations; (vi) and finally truly end-to-end architectures, i.e. differentiable models starting from a sequence and returning a 3D structure. Here, we provide an overview and our opinion of the novel deep learning approaches developed in the last two years and widely used in CASP14.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.