RECORD
The size function of massive satellites from the $R_e-R_h$ and $M_{star}-M_h$ relations: constraining the role of environment
Astrophysics of Galaxies · Submitted 27 May 2021
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim The $R_e-R_h$ appears to be fundamental to connect galaxies and their host haloes.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
In previous work we showed that a semi-empirical model in which galaxies in host dark matter haloes are assigned stellar masses via a stellar mass-halo mass (SMHM) relation and sizes ($R_e$) via a linear and tight $R_e-R_h$ relation, can faithfully reproduce the size function of local SDSS central galaxies and the strong size evolution of massive galaxies (MGs, $M_{\rm star}>10^{11.2}M_\odot$). In this third paper of the series, we focus on the population of satellite MGs. We find that without any additional calibration and irrespective of the exact SMHM relation, fraction of quenched galaxies or level of stellar stripping, the same model is able to reproduce the local size function of quiescent satellite MGs in SDSS. In addition, the same model can reproduce the puzzling weak dependence of mean size on host halo mass for both central and satellite galaxies. The model also matches the size function of starforming satellite MGs, after assuming that some of them transform into massive lenticulars in a few Gyr after infalling in the group/cluster environment. However, the vast majority of satellite lenticulars is predicted to form before infall. The $R_e-R_h$ appears to be fundamental to connect galaxies and their host haloes.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | In previous work we showed that a semi-empirical model in which galaxies in host dark matter haloes are assigned stellar masses via a stellar mass-halo mass (SMHM) relation and sizes ($R_e$) via a linear and tight $R_e-R_h$ relation, can faithfully reproduce the size function of local SDSS central galaxies and the strong size evolution of massive galaxies (MGs, $M_{\rm star}>10^{11.2}M_\odot$). | background 0.99 | 0.34 | 0.07 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | In this third paper of the series, we focus on the population of satellite MGs. | contribution 0.87 | 0.36 | 0.03 | asserted 0.81 |
| s2 | We find that without any additional calibration and irrespective of the exact SMHM relation, fraction of quenched galaxies or level of stellar stripping, the same model is able to reproduce the local size function of quiescent satellite MGs in SDSS. | result 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.62 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | In addition, the same model can reproduce the puzzling weak dependence of mean size on host halo mass for both central and satellite galaxies. | result 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.17 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | The model also matches the size function of starforming satellite MGs, after assuming that some of them transform into massive lenticulars in a few Gyr after infalling in the group/cluster environment. | result 0.99 | 0.85 | 0.11 | asserted 0.83 |
| s5 | However, the vast majority of satellite lenticulars is predicted to form before infall. | result 0.89 | 0.83 | 0.12 | asserted 0.91 |
| s6 | The $R_e-R_h$ appears to be fundamental to connect galaxies and their host haloes. | interpretation 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.61 | hedged possibility 0.81 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
In previous work we showed that a semi-empirical model in which galaxies in host dark matter haloes are assigned stellar masses via a stellar mass-halo mass (SMHM) relation and sizes ($R_e$) via a linear and tight $R_e-R_h$ relation, can faithfully reproduce the size function of local SDSS central galaxies and the strong size evolution of massive galaxies (MGs, $M_{\rm star}>10^{11.2}M_\odot$). In this third paper of the series, we focus on the population of satellite MGs. We find that without any additional calibration and irrespective of the exact SMHM relation, fraction of quenched galaxies or level of stellar stripping, the same model is able to reproduce the local size function of quiescent satellite MGs in SDSS. In addition, the same model can reproduce the puzzling weak dependence of mean size on host halo mass for both central and satellite galaxies. The model also matches the size function of starforming satellite MGs, after assuming that some of them transform into massive lenticulars in a few Gyr after infalling in the group/cluster environment. However, the vast majority of satellite lenticulars is predicted to form before infall. The $R_e-R_h$ appears to be fundamental to connect galaxies and their host haloes.
Human review
How the literature uses it
What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites
What it cites · 2 sentences without a confident label
Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
-
We here closely follow the modelling approach of Papers I and II[We make extensive use of the Python package [ref] .]: * Dark matter catalogues.
COLOSSUS: A python toolkit for cosmology, large-scale structure, and dark matter halos · Methods · 0.97
Uses data or values from 1 paper
-
By using current estimates of the galaxy stellar mass function for quenched and star forming galaxies ( [ref] , [ref] ), in Paper 2, we have found that $μ$ is likely to lie at intermediate values, $μ≈2.5$.
The evolution of the galaxy stellar mass function over the last twelve billion years from a combination of ground-based and HST surveys · Methods · 0.93
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.