Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Behavior of Liquidity Providers in Decentralized Exchanges

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.13822 v2 pith:2SE5IJI2 submitted 2021-05-28 q-fin.CP

classification q-fin.CP
keywords liquidityprovidersdexestradingmarketpairsbehaviordecentralized
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Decentralized exchanges (DEXes) have introduced an innovative trading mechanism, where it is not necessary to match buy-orders and sell-orders to execute a trade. DEXes execute each trade individually, and the exchange rate is automatically determined by the ratio of assets reserved in the market. Therefore, apart from trading, financial players can also liquidity providers, benefiting from transaction fees from trades executed in DEXes. Although liquidity providers are essential for the functionality of DEXes, it is not clear how liquidity providers behave in such markets. In this paper, we aim to understand how liquidity providers react to market information and how they benefit from providing liquidity in DEXes. We measure the operations of liquidity providers on Uniswap and analyze how they determine their investment strategy based on market changes. We also reveal their returns and risks of investments in different trading pair categories, i.e., stable pairs, normal pairs, and exotic pairs. Further, we investigate the movement of liquidity between trading pools. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that systematically studies the behavior of liquidity providers in DEXes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Verifiability of Total Value Locked (TVL) in Decentralized Finance

    q-fin.GN 2025-05 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Most DeFi TVL figures are only partially verifiable: 10.5% of 939 Ethereum protocols use external servers, and only 23.5% of 400 reconstructed protocols match published values within 5%.

  2. Multi-Currency AMMs for Decentralized FOREX Markets: Feasibility & Optimal Design

    q-fin.TR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Optimized multi-currency constant-mean AMM pools with correlation-based currency clustering cut modeled FX trading costs by ~13% versus USD vehicle-currency routing.

  3. Gasp: A DeFi Application Specic Rollup as a Consolidation Layer for All Assets

    cs.CR 2026-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A whitepaper proposing an EigenLayer-secured 'master-rollup' DEX that claims bridge-free cross-chain swaps with L1-grade security, MEV minimization, and staking-based liquidity incentives.

  4. Price Discovery in Cryptocurrency Markets

    q-fin.TR 2025-06 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    Using standard price discovery metrics on 2024 data, centralized exchanges lead Uniswap for ETH price discovery, and CME futures generally lead Binance spot for BTC.

Pith tools