REVIEW
4-Adic Complexity of Interleaved Quaternary Sequences
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Tang and Ding \cite{X. Tang} present a series of quaternary sequences $w(a, b)$ interleaved by two binary sequences $a$ and $b$ with ideal autocorrelation and show that such interleaved quaternary sequences have optimal autocorrelation. In this paper we consider the 4-adic complexity $FC_{w}(4)$ of such quaternary sequence $w=w(a, b)$. We present a general formula on $FC_{w}(4)$, $w=w(a, b)$. As a direct consequence, we obtain a general lower bound $FC_{w}(4)\geq\log_{4}(4^{n}-1)$ where $2n$ is the period of the sequence $w$. By taking $a$ and $b$ to be several types of known binary sequences with ideal autocorrelation ($m$-sequences, twin-prime, Legendre, Hall sequences and their complement, shift or sample sequences), we compute the exact values of $FC_{w}(4)$, $w=w(a, b)$ and show that in most cases $FC_{w}(4)$ reaches or nearly reaches the maximum value $\log_{4}(4^{2n}-1)$. Our results show that the 4-adic complexity of the quaternary sequences defined in \cite{X. Tang} are large enough to resist the attack of the rational approximation algorithm.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.