Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparing Two Different Approaches in Big Data and Business Analysis for Churn Prediction with the Focus on How Apache Spark Employed

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2105.15147 v1 pith:32VNHOH3 submitted 2021-05-28 cs.DC cs.AI

classification cs.DCcs.AI
keywords analysisdataapproachessparkbusinessapachechurncompanies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Due to the significant importance of Big Data analysis, especially in business-related topics such as improving services, finding potential customers, and selecting practical approaches to manage income and expenses, many companies attempt to collaborate with scientists to find how, why, and what they should analysis. In this work, we would like to compare and discuss two different approaches that employed in business analysis topic in Big Data with more consideration on how they utilized Spark. Both studies have investigated Churn Prediction as their case study for their proposed approaches since it is an essential topic in business analysis for companies to recognize a customer intends to leave or stop using their services. Here, we focus on Apache Spark since it has provided several solutions to handle a massive amount of data in recent years efficiently. This feature in Spark makes it one of the most robust candidate tools to upfront with a Big Data problem, particularly time and resource are concerns.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools