Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Preview, Attend and Review: Schema-Aware Curriculum Learning for Multi-Domain Dialog State Tracking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.00291 v1 pith:A6EHBMG3 submitted 2021-06-01 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords curriculumdialoglearningmodelmodulestatetrackingdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Existing dialog state tracking (DST) models are trained with dialog data in a random order, neglecting rich structural information in a dataset. In this paper, we propose to use curriculum learning (CL) to better leverage both the curriculum structure and schema structure for task-oriented dialogs. Specifically, we propose a model-agnostic framework called Schema-aware Curriculum Learning for Dialog State Tracking (SaCLog), which consists of a preview module that pre-trains a DST model with schema information, a curriculum module that optimizes the model with CL, and a review module that augments mispredicted data to reinforce the CL training. We show that our proposed approach improves DST performance over both a transformer-based and RNN-based DST model (TripPy and TRADE) and achieves new state-of-the-art results on WOZ2.0 and MultiWOZ2.1.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multi-Intent Recognition in Dialogue Understanding: A Comparison Between Smaller Open-Source LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    On MultiWOZ 2.1 multi-intent classification, Mistral-7B-v0.1 beats Llama-2-7B and Yi-6B in few-shot prompting (weighted F1 0.50), while supervised BERT remains far stronger (F1 0.92).

Pith tools