Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Semi-supervised Models are Strong Unsupervised Domain Adaptation Learners

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.00417 v1 pith:CONSPGZ2 submitted 2021-06-01 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords methodsdomaintargetadaptationavailabledifferentfurtherfuture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) and semi-supervised learning (SSL) are two typical strategies to reduce expensive manual annotations in machine learning. In order to learn effective models for a target task, UDA utilizes the available labeled source data, which may have different distributions from unlabeled samples in the target domain, while SSL employs few manually annotated target samples. Although UDA and SSL are seemingly very different strategies, we find that they are closely related in terms of task objectives and solutions, and SSL is a special case of UDA problems. Based on this finding, we further investigate whether SSL methods work on UDA tasks. By adapting eight representative SSL algorithms on UDA benchmarks, we show that SSL methods are strong UDA learners. Especially, state-of-the-art SSL methods significantly outperform existing UDA methods on the challenging UDA benchmark of DomainNet, and state-of-the-art UDA methods could be further enhanced with SSL techniques. We thus promote that SSL methods should be employed as baselines in future UDA studies and expect that the revealed relationship between UDA and SSL could shed light on future UDA development. Codes are available at \url{https://github.com/YBZh}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Self-supervised Benchmark Lottery on ImageNet: Do Marginal Improvements Translate to Improvements on Similar Datasets?

    cs.CV 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Self-supervised model rankings change substantially on ImageNet variants: DINO and Swav drop on Rendition and Sketch while MoCo and Barlow improve, so ImageNet-only benchmarking is misleading.

Pith tools