Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Simple Recipe for Multilingual Grammatical Error Correction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.03830 v2 pith:I6OOHVRD submitted 2021-06-07 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords clang-8modelsmultilingualcorrectiondatasetenglisherrorfine-tuning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents a simple recipe to train state-of-the-art multilingual Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) models. We achieve this by first proposing a language-agnostic method to generate a large number of synthetic examples. The second ingredient is to use large-scale multilingual language models (up to 11B parameters). Once fine-tuned on language-specific supervised sets we surpass the previous state-of-the-art results on GEC benchmarks in four languages: English, Czech, German and Russian. Having established a new set of baselines for GEC, we make our results easily reproducible and accessible by releasing a cLang-8 dataset. It is produced by using our best model, which we call gT5, to clean the targets of a widely used yet noisy lang-8 dataset. cLang-8 greatly simplifies typical GEC training pipelines composed of multiple fine-tuning stages -- we demonstrate that performing a single fine-tuning step on cLang-8 with the off-the-shelf language models yields further accuracy improvements over an already top-performing gT5 model for English.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Automated Essay Scoring Incorporating Annotations from Automated Feedback Systems

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    On the PERSUADE corpus, adding generated argument-component tags to essay text raised automated scoring agreement from a QWK of 0.860 to 0.868, while error-only tags lowered it.

Pith tools