Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Mechanical metamaterials: does toughness characterize fracture?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.03949 v1 pith:GE5KLDIC submitted 2021-06-07 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords fracturemetamaterialscharacterizeconventionalmechanicalmechanicsadditiveanalyses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Rapid progress in additive manufacturing methods has created a new class of ultralight and strong architected metamaterials that resemble periodic truss structures. The mechanical performance of these metamaterials with a very large number of unit cells is ultimately limited by their tolerance to damage and defects, but an understanding of this sensitivity has remained elusive. Using a stretching-dominated micro-architecture and metamaterial specimens comprising millions of unit-cells we show that not only is the stress intensity factor, as used in conventional elastic fracture mechanics, insufficient to characterize fracture but also that conventional fracture testing protocols are inadequate. Via a combination of numerical calculations and asymptotic analyses, we extend the ideas of fracture mechanics and develop a general test and design protocol for the failure of metamaterials.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools