Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

To Smooth or Not? When Label Smoothing Meets Noisy Labels

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.04149 v6 pith:HEARIDW6 submitted 2021-06-08 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords labelslabelwhennoisyhardhighlearningnoise
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Label smoothing (LS) is an arising learning paradigm that uses the positively weighted average of both the hard training labels and uniformly distributed soft labels. It was shown that LS serves as a regularizer for training data with hard labels and therefore improves the generalization of the model. Later it was reported LS even helps with improving robustness when learning with noisy labels. However, we observed that the advantage of LS vanishes when we operate in a high label noise regime. Intuitively speaking, this is due to the increased entropy of $\mathbb{P}(\text{noisy label}|X)$ when the noise rate is high, in which case, further applying LS tends to "over-smooth" the estimated posterior. We proceeded to discover that several learning-with-noisy-labels solutions in the literature instead relate more closely to negative/not label smoothing (NLS), which acts counter to LS and defines as using a negative weight to combine the hard and soft labels! We provide understandings for the properties of LS and NLS when learning with noisy labels. Among other established properties, we theoretically show NLS is considered more beneficial when the label noise rates are high. We provide extensive experimental results on multiple benchmarks to support our findings too. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/UCSC-REAL/negative-label-smoothing.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Leveraging Dissimilarity Invariance as a Robust Anchor for Learning with Noisy Labels

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Under label noise, dissimilarity between unrelated samples is more stable than similarity, and the NegScale framework exploits this to improve noisy-label training.

  2. Noise-Resilient Point-wise Anomaly Detection in Time Series Using Weak Segment Labels

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    NRdetector combines positive-unlabeled learning, confidence-based sample selection, and a temporal smoothness-and-separability loss to predict point-level anomalies from noisy segment labels, and reports the best F1 o...

  3. Detecting Mislabeled and Corrupted Data via Pointwise Mutual Information

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Samples with low pointwise mutual information between image and label are mostly mislabeled or corrupted, and dropping them before training improves MNIST accuracy by up to 15%.

Pith tools