REVIEW 3 cited by
To Smooth or Not? When Label Smoothing Meets Noisy Labels
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Label smoothing (LS) is an arising learning paradigm that uses the positively weighted average of both the hard training labels and uniformly distributed soft labels. It was shown that LS serves as a regularizer for training data with hard labels and therefore improves the generalization of the model. Later it was reported LS even helps with improving robustness when learning with noisy labels. However, we observed that the advantage of LS vanishes when we operate in a high label noise regime. Intuitively speaking, this is due to the increased entropy of $\mathbb{P}(\text{noisy label}|X)$ when the noise rate is high, in which case, further applying LS tends to "over-smooth" the estimated posterior. We proceeded to discover that several learning-with-noisy-labels solutions in the literature instead relate more closely to negative/not label smoothing (NLS), which acts counter to LS and defines as using a negative weight to combine the hard and soft labels! We provide understandings for the properties of LS and NLS when learning with noisy labels. Among other established properties, we theoretically show NLS is considered more beneficial when the label noise rates are high. We provide extensive experimental results on multiple benchmarks to support our findings too. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/UCSC-REAL/negative-label-smoothing.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Leveraging Dissimilarity Invariance as a Robust Anchor for Learning with Noisy Labels
Under label noise, dissimilarity between unrelated samples is more stable than similarity, and the NegScale framework exploits this to improve noisy-label training.
-
Noise-Resilient Point-wise Anomaly Detection in Time Series Using Weak Segment Labels
NRdetector combines positive-unlabeled learning, confidence-based sample selection, and a temporal smoothness-and-separability loss to predict point-level anomalies from noisy segment labels, and reports the best F1 o...
-
Detecting Mislabeled and Corrupted Data via Pointwise Mutual Information
Samples with low pointwise mutual information between image and label are mostly mislabeled or corrupted, and dropping them before training improves MNIST accuracy by up to 15%.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.