REVIEW 2 cited by
FEVEROUS: Fact Extraction and VERification Over Unstructured and Structured information
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Fact verification has attracted a lot of attention in the machine learning and natural language processing communities, as it is one of the key methods for detecting misinformation. Existing large-scale benchmarks for this task have focused mostly on textual sources, i.e. unstructured information, and thus ignored the wealth of information available in structured formats, such as tables. In this paper we introduce a novel dataset and benchmark, Fact Extraction and VERification Over Unstructured and Structured information (FEVEROUS), which consists of 87,026 verified claims. Each claim is annotated with evidence in the form of sentences and/or cells from tables in Wikipedia, as well as a label indicating whether this evidence supports, refutes, or does not provide enough information to reach a verdict. Furthermore, we detail our efforts to track and minimize the biases present in the dataset and could be exploited by models, e.g. being able to predict the label without using evidence. Finally, we develop a baseline for verifying claims against text and tables which predicts both the correct evidence and verdict for 18% of the claims.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ClimateViz: A Benchmark for Statistical Reasoning and Fact Verification on Scientific Charts
A large-scale benchmark shows that leading multimodal language models still underperform expert humans at verifying climate claims from scientific charts.
-
TableMind: An Autonomous Programmatic Agent for Tool-Augmented Table Reasoning
TableMind, a two-stage SFT-plus-RL agent trained on an 8B model, reports state-of-the-art results on three table reasoning benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.