Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Koios: A Deep Learning Benchmark Suite for FPGA Architecture and CAD Research

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.07087 v1 pith:ICQHFCTO submitted 2021-06-13 cs.AR

Koios: A Deep Learning Benchmark Suite for FPGA Architecture and CAD Research

classification cs.AR
keywords benchmarksuitearchitecturefpgabenchmarksarchitecturalcircuitsdesigns
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the prevalence of deep learning (DL) in many applications, researchers are investigating different ways of optimizing FPGA architecture and CAD to achieve better quality-of-results (QoR) on DL-based workloads. In this optimization process, benchmark circuits are an essential component; the QoR achieved on a set of benchmarks is the main driver for architecture and CAD design choices. However, current academic benchmark suites are inadequate, as they do not capture any designs from the DL domain. This work presents a new suite of DL acceleration benchmark circuits for FPGA architecture and CAD research, called Koios. This suite of 19 circuits covers a wide variety of accelerated neural networks, design sizes, implementation styles, abstraction levels, and numerical precisions. These designs are larger, more data parallel, more heterogeneous, more deeply pipelined, and utilize more FPGA architectural features compared to existing open-source benchmarks. This enables researchers to pin-point architectural inefficiencies for this class of workloads and optimize CAD tools on more realistic benchmarks that stress the CAD algorithms in different ways. In this paper, we describe the designs in our benchmark suite, present results of running them through the Verilog-to-Routing (VTR) flow using a recent FPGA architecture model, and identify key insights from the resulting metrics. On average, our benchmarks have 3.7x more netlist primitives, 1.8x and 4.7x higher DSP and BRAM densities, and 1.7x higher frequency with 1.9x more near-critical paths compared to the widely-used VTR suite. Finally, we present two example case studies showing how architectural exploration for DL-optimized FPGAs can be performed using our new benchmark suite.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.