REVIEW 1 cited by
On the proper role of linguistically-oriented deep net analysis in linguistic theorizing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
A lively research field has recently emerged that uses experimental methods to probe the linguistic behavior of modern deep networks. While work in this tradition often reports intriguing results about the grammatical skills of deep nets, it is not clear what their implications for linguistic theorizing should be. As a consequence, linguistically-oriented deep net analysis has had very little impact on linguistics at large. In this chapter, I suggest that deep networks should be treated as theories making explicit predictions about the acceptability of linguistic utterances. I argue that, if we overcome some obstacles standing in the way of seriously pursuing this idea, we will gain a powerful new theoretical tool, complementary to mainstream algebraic approaches.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Language Models Largely Exhibit Human-like Constituent Ordering Preferences
Across heavy NP shift, dative alternation and multiple PP shift, LLM ordering preferences correlate with human judgments, but particle movement preferences do not.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.