Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Learning to predict target location with turbulent odor plumes

Quantitative Methods · Submitted 16 Jun 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We find that both intensity and timing can separately predict target location even from a distance of several meters; however their efficacy varies with the dilution of the odor in space.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2106.08988 (version 1)
Pith ID56OBBLOA, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAgnese Seminara, Lorenzo Rosasco, Nicodemo Magnoli, Nicola Rigolli. "Learning to predict target location with turbulent odor plumes." arXiv:2106.08988 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/56OBBLOA
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,429 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.54 · human participants 0.04 · controlled comparison 0.10 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.15 · compares with prior results 0.19 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Animal behavior and neural recordings show that the brain is able to measure both the intensity of an odor and the timing of odor encounters. However, whether intensity or timing of odor detections is more informative for olfactory-driven behavior is not understood. To tackle this question, we consider the problem of locating a target using the odor it releases. We ask whether the position of a target is best predicted by measures of timing intensity of its odor, sampled for a short period of time. To answer this question, we feed data from accurate numerical simulations of odor transport to machine learning algorithms that learn how to connect odor to target location. We find that both intensity and timing can separately predict target location even from a distance of several meters; however their efficacy varies with the dilution of the odor in space. Thus organisms that use olfaction from different ranges may have to switch among different modalities. This has implications on how the brain should represent odors as the target is approached. We demonstrate simple strategies to improve accuracy and robustness of the prediction by modifying odor sampling and appropriately combining distinct measures together. To test the predictions, animal behavior and odor representation should be monitored as the animal moves relative to the target, or in virtual conditions that mimic concentrated dilute environments.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Animal behavior and neural recordings show that the brain is able to measure both the intensity of an odor and the timing of odor encounters. background 1.00 0.08 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 However, whether intensity or timing of odor detections is more informative for olfactory-driven behavior is not understood. gap 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 0.86
s2 To tackle this question, we consider the problem of locating a target using the odor it releases. contribution 0.62 0.35 0.02 unclear 0.55
s3 We ask whether the position of a target is best predicted by measures of timing intensity of its odor, sampled for a short period of time. contribution 0.54 0.18 0.04 unclear 0.82
s4 To answer this question, we feed data from accurate numerical simulations of odor transport to machine learning algorithms that learn how to connect odor to target location. method 0.99 0.94 0.03 asserted 0.76
s5 We find that both intensity and timing can separately predict target location even from a distance of several meters; however their efficacy varies with the dilution of the odor in space. result 1.00 0.96 0.82 asserted 1.00
s6 Thus organisms that use olfaction from different ranges may have to switch among different modalities. interpretation 1.00 0.24 0.23 hedged possibility 1.00
s7 This has implications on how the brain should represent odors as the target is approached. interpretation 1.00 0.21 0.09 asserted 0.50
s8 We demonstrate simple strategies to improve accuracy and robustness of the prediction by modifying odor sampling and appropriately combining distinct measures together. contribution 0.74 0.93 0.10 asserted 1.00
s9 To test the predictions, animal behavior and odor representation should be monitored as the animal moves relative to the target, or in virtual conditions that mimic concentrated dilute environments. future work 1.00 0.05 0.04 hedged possibility 0.54

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Animal behavior and neural recordings show that the brain is able to measure both the intensity of an odor and the timing of odor encounters. However, whether intensity or timing of odor detections is more informative for olfactory-driven behavior is not understood. To tackle this question, we consider the problem of locating a target using the odor it releases. We ask whether the position of a target is best predicted by measures of timing intensity of its odor, sampled for a short period of time. To answer this question, we feed data from accurate numerical simulations of odor transport to machine learning algorithms that learn how to connect odor to target location. We find that both intensity and timing can separately predict target location even from a distance of several meters; however their efficacy varies with the dilution of the odor in space. Thus organisms that use olfaction from different ranges may have to switch among different modalities. This has implications on how the brain should represent odors as the target is approached. We demonstrate simple strategies to improve accuracy and robustness of the prediction by modifying odor sampling and appropriately combining distinct measures together. To test the predictions, animal behavior and odor representation should be monitored as the animal moves relative to the target, or in virtual conditions that mimic concentrated dilute environments.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.