Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Towards Explainable Student Group Collaboration Assessment Models Using Temporal Representations of Individual Student Roles

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.09623 v1 pith:4BT6TJZ6 submitted 2021-06-17 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords studentcollaborationgrouprepresentationstemporalassessmentdeep-learningexplainable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Collaboration is identified as a required and necessary skill for students to be successful in the fields of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). However, due to growing student population and limited teaching staff it is difficult for teachers to provide constructive feedback and instill collaborative skills using instructional methods. Development of simple and easily explainable machine-learning-based automated systems can help address this problem. Improving upon our previous work, in this paper we propose using simple temporal-CNN deep-learning models to assess student group collaboration that take in temporal representations of individual student roles as input. We check the applicability of dynamically changing feature representations for student group collaboration assessment and how they impact the overall performance. We also use Grad-CAM visualizations to better understand and interpret the important temporal indices that led to the deep-learning model's decision.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Provable Correctness to Probabilistic Generation: A Comparative Review of Program Synthesis Paradigms

    cs.PL 2025-07 conditional

    A bachelor's thesis surveys deductive, inductive, sketch-based, LLM-based, and neuro-symbolic program synthesis, emphasizing correctness versus usability trade-offs.

Pith tools