Pith. sign in

REVIEW

On Sampling Top-K Recommendation Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.10621 v1 pith:PGOTNLI4 submitted 2021-06-20 cs.IR stat.AP

On Sampling Top-K Recommendation Evaluation

classification cs.IR stat.AP
keywords top-globalsamplingalgorithmshit-ratiohit-ratiosrecommendationaccurate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, Rendle has warned that the use of sampling-based top-$k$ metrics might not suffice. This throws a number of recent studies on deep learning-based recommendation algorithms, and classic non-deep-learning algorithms using such a metric, into jeopardy. In this work, we thoroughly investigate the relationship between the sampling and global top-$K$ Hit-Ratio (HR, or Recall), originally proposed by Koren[2] and extensively used by others. By formulating the problem of aligning sampling top-$k$ ($SHR@k$) and global top-$K$ ($HR@K$) Hit-Ratios through a mapping function $f$, so that $SHR@k\approx HR@f(k)$, we demonstrate both theoretically and experimentally that the sampling top-$k$ Hit-Ratio provides an accurate approximation of its global (exact) counterpart, and can consistently predict the correct winners (the same as indicate by their corresponding global Hit-Ratios).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.