Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

QUBO formulations for numerical quantum computing

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.10819 v4 pith:7MX5QCNW submitted 2021-06-21 quant-ph

classification quant-ph
keywords quantumlinearqubosystemmodelssolvingalgorithmbinary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the advent of quantum computers, many quantum computing algorithms are being developed. Solving linear systems is one of the most fundamental problems in almost all science and engineering. The Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd algorithm, a monumental quantum algorithm for solving linear systems on gate model quantum computers, was invented and several advanced variations have been developed. For a given n by n matrix A and a vector b, we will find unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) models for a vector x that satisfies Ax=b. To formulate QUBO models for a linear system solving problem, we make use of a linear least-square problem with binary representation of the solution. We validate those QUBO models on the D-Wave system and discuss the results. For a simple system, we provide a Python code to calculate the matrix characterizing the relationship between the variables and to print the test code that can be used directly in the D-Wave system.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. QUBO Refinement: Achieving Superior Precision through Iterative Quantum Formulation with Limited Qubits

    quant-ph 2024-11 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    An iterative bit-slicing QUBO refinement method claims 16-decimal precision for linear systems but demonstrates only 1e-13 error and lacks a proven convergence guarantee.

Pith tools