REVIEW 3 cited by
DocFormer: End-to-End Transformer for Document Understanding
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We present DocFormer -- a multi-modal transformer based architecture for the task of Visual Document Understanding (VDU). VDU is a challenging problem which aims to understand documents in their varied formats (forms, receipts etc.) and layouts. In addition, DocFormer is pre-trained in an unsupervised fashion using carefully designed tasks which encourage multi-modal interaction. DocFormer uses text, vision and spatial features and combines them using a novel multi-modal self-attention layer. DocFormer also shares learned spatial embeddings across modalities which makes it easy for the model to correlate text to visual tokens and vice versa. DocFormer is evaluated on 4 different datasets each with strong baselines. DocFormer achieves state-of-the-art results on all of them, sometimes beating models 4x its size (in no. of parameters).
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Granite Vision: a lightweight, open-source multimodal model for enterprise Intelligence
Granite Vision is a ~3B parameter open-weights vision-language model that reaches state-of-the-art scores on document understanding benchmarks despite its small size.
-
Vector embedding of multi-modal texts: a tool for discovery?
Using ColPali embeddings of 3,600 textbook page images, cosine similarity beats dot product, Euclidean, and Manhattan distances on top-5 retrieval, but only reaches 0.51 precision@5 without a text-only baseline.
-
Survey on Question Answering over Visually Rich Documents: Methods, Challenges, and Trends
A structured overview of question answering over visually rich documents, comparing encoding, vision-only, and multi-page methods, and highlighting comparability issues in existing benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.