Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Evaluation of Thematic Coherence in Microblogs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.15971 v1 pith:GN44QQHX submitted 2021-06-30 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords metricscoherencethematicclustersdifferenttgmsevaluationlevel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Collecting together microblogs representing opinions about the same topics within the same timeframe is useful to a number of different tasks and practitioners. A major question is how to evaluate the quality of such thematic clusters. Here we create a corpus of microblog clusters from three different domains and time windows and define the task of evaluating thematic coherence. We provide annotation guidelines and human annotations of thematic coherence by journalist experts. We subsequently investigate the efficacy of different automated evaluation metrics for the task. We consider a range of metrics including surface level metrics, ones for topic model coherence and text generation metrics (TGMs). While surface level metrics perform well, outperforming topic coherence metrics, they are not as consistent as TGMs. TGMs are more reliable than all other metrics considered for capturing thematic coherence in microblog clusters due to being less sensitive to the effect of time windows.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A document processing pipeline for the construction of a dataset for topic modeling based on the judgments of the Italian Supreme Court

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A YOLOv8x, TrOCR, and GLiNER pipeline converts Italian Supreme Court PDFs into an anonymized topic-modeling dataset, but the reported improvement over OCR-only is not supported by the paper's own Table 13.

Pith tools