Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Choice of a Mentor: A Subjective Evaluation of Expectations, Experiences and Feedbacks

PaperPDF from arXiv

data files

Paper breakdownThe authors' claims, conditions and measurements, as JSON Signed receiptProof this review has not been altered
X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Hacker News
Kaibalyapati Mishra

General Economics · Submitted 30 Jun 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Recent trends in academics show an increase in enrollment levels in higher education Predominantly in Doctoral programmes where individual scholars institutes and supervisors play the key roles The human factor at receiving end of academic excellence is the scholar having a supervisor at the facilitating end In this paper I try to establish the role of different factors and availability of information about them in forming the basic choice set in a scholars mind After studying three different groups of individuals who were subjected to substitutive choices we found that scholars prefer an approachable, moderately intervening and frequently interacting professor as their guide

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2107.00106 (version 1)
Pith ID75A436PD, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationKaibalyapati Mishra. "Choice of a Mentor: A Subjective Evaluation of Expectations, Experiences and Feedbacks." arXiv:2107.00106 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/75A436PD
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 1,736 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.07 · human participants 0.93 · controlled comparison 0.09 · randomized assignment 0.04 · states quantitative result 0.07 · compares with prior results 0.08 · mentions code or data availability 0.01.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Recent trends in academics show an increase in enrollment levels in higher education Predominantly in Doctoral programmes where individual scholars institutes and supervisors play the key roles The human factor at receiving end of academic excellence is the scholar having a supervisor at the facilitating end In this paper I try to establish the role of different factors and availability of information about them in forming the basic choice set in a scholars mind After studying three different groups of individuals who were subjected to substitutive choices we found that scholars prefer an approachable, moderately intervening and frequently interacting professor as their guide

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Recent trends in academics show an increase in enrollment levels in higher education Predominantly in Doctoral programmes where individual scholars institutes and supervisors play the key roles The human factor at receiving end of academic excellence is the scholar having a supervisor at the facilitating end In this paper I try to establish the role of different factors and availability of information about them in forming the basic choice set in a scholars mind After studying three different groups of individuals who were subjected to substitutive choices we found that scholars prefer an approachable, moderately intervening and frequently interacting professor as their guide result 0.64 0.91 0.90 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: empirical study 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Recent trends in academics show an increase in enrollment levels in higher education Predominantly in Doctoral programmes where individual scholars institutes and supervisors play the key roles The human factor at receiving end of academic excellence is the scholar having a supervisor at the facilitating end In this paper I try to establish the role of different factors and availability of information about them in forming the basic choice set in a scholars mind After studying three different groups of individuals who were subjected to substitutive choices we found that scholars prefer an approachable, moderately intervening and frequently interacting professor as their guide

Human review

How Pith checks papers → · Full audit of this paper →

How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.