Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Spotlight: A General Method for Discovering Systematic Errors in Deep Learning Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.00758 v2 pith:DAO3PFPT submitted 2021-07-01 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords errorsmodelsspotlightsystematiccorresponddatadiscoveringlearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Supervised learning models often make systematic errors on rare subsets of the data. When these subsets correspond to explicit labels in the data (e.g., gender, race) such poor performance can be identified straightforwardly. This paper introduces a method for discovering systematic errors that do not correspond to such explicitly labelled subgroups. The key idea is that similar inputs tend to have similar representations in the final hidden layer of a neural network. We leverage this structure by "shining a spotlight" on this representation space to find contiguous regions where the model performs poorly. We show that the spotlight surfaces semantically meaningful areas of weakness in a wide variety of existing models spanning computer vision, NLP, and recommender systems.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools