Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Inferring the drivers of language change using spatial models

Physics and Society · Submitted 5 Jul 2021

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our calibrations reveal that while some changes can be explained by diffusion alone, others are clearly the result of substantial asymmetries between variants.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2107.02056 (version 1)
Pith IDELOVISAV, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJames Burridge, Tamsin Blaxter. "Inferring the drivers of language change using spatial models." arXiv:2107.02056 (2021). https://pith.science/paper/ELOVISAV
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,000 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.43 · human participants 0.07 · controlled comparison 0.16 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.07 · compares with prior results 0.20 · mentions code or data availability 0.04.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Discovering and quantifying the drivers of language change is a major challenge. Hypotheses about causal factors proliferate, but are difficult to rigorously test. Here we ask a simple question: can 20th Century changes in English English be explained as a consequence of spatial diffusion, or have other processes created bias in favour of certain linguistic forms? Using two of the most comprehensive spatial datasets available, which measure the state of English at the beginning and end of the 20th century, we calibrate a simple spatial model so that, initialised with the early state, it evolves into the later. Our calibrations reveal that while some changes can be explained by diffusion alone, others are clearly the result of substantial asymmetries between variants. We discuss the origins of these asymmetries and, as a by-product, we generate a full spatio-temporal prediction for the spatial evolution of English features over the 20th Century, and a prediction of the future.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Discovering and quantifying the drivers of language change is a major challenge. background 0.96 0.03 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 Hypotheses about causal factors proliferate, but are difficult to rigorously test. background 0.68 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 Here we ask a simple question: can 20th Century changes in English English be explained as a consequence of spatial diffusion, or have other processes created bias in favour of certain linguistic forms? contribution 0.46 0.25 0.03 unclear 0.64
s3 Using two of the most comprehensive spatial datasets available, which measure the state of English at the beginning and end of the 20th century, we calibrate a simple spatial model so that, initialised with the early state, it evolves into the later. method 1.00 0.96 0.04 asserted 0.98
s4 Our calibrations reveal that while some changes can be explained by diffusion alone, others are clearly the result of substantial asymmetries between variants. result 0.99 0.96 0.79 asserted 0.99
s5 We discuss the origins of these asymmetries and, as a by-product, we generate a full spatio-temporal prediction for the spatial evolution of English features over the 20th Century, and a prediction of the future. contribution 0.80 0.95 0.16 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 0.63 · evidence from analysis of existing data 0.79.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Discovering and quantifying the drivers of language change is a major challenge. Hypotheses about causal factors proliferate, but are difficult to rigorously test. Here we ask a simple question: can 20th Century changes in English English be explained as a consequence of spatial diffusion, or have other processes created bias in favour of certain linguistic forms? Using two of the most comprehensive spatial datasets available, which measure the state of English at the beginning and end of the 20th century, we calibrate a simple spatial model so that, initialised with the early state, it evolves into the later. Our calibrations reveal that while some changes can be explained by diffusion alone, others are clearly the result of substantial asymmetries between variants. We discuss the origins of these asymmetries and, as a by-product, we generate a full spatio-temporal prediction for the spatial evolution of English features over the 20th Century, and a prediction of the future.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.