Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.03342 v3 pith:2FHOKKP5 submitted 2021-07-07 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords neuraluncertaintynetworksdifferentapproachesbeenchallengesgive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Due to their increasing spread, confidence in neural network predictions became more and more important. However, basic neural networks do not deliver certainty estimates or suffer from over or under confidence. Many researchers have been working on understanding and quantifying uncertainty in a neural network's prediction. As a result, different types and sources of uncertainty have been identified and a variety of approaches to measure and quantify uncertainty in neural networks have been proposed. This work gives a comprehensive overview of uncertainty estimation in neural networks, reviews recent advances in the field, highlights current challenges, and identifies potential research opportunities. It is intended to give anyone interested in uncertainty estimation in neural networks a broad overview and introduction, without presupposing prior knowledge in this field. A comprehensive introduction to the most crucial sources of uncertainty is given and their separation into reducible model uncertainty and not reducible data uncertainty is presented. The modeling of these uncertainties based on deterministic neural networks, Bayesian neural networks, ensemble of neural networks, and test-time data augmentation approaches is introduced and different branches of these fields as well as the latest developments are discussed. For a practical application, we discuss different measures of uncertainty, approaches for the calibration of neural networks and give an overview of existing baselines and implementations. Different examples from the wide spectrum of challenges in different fields give an idea of the needs and challenges regarding uncertainties in practical applications. Additionally, the practical limitations of current methods for mission- and safety-critical real world applications are discussed and an outlook on the next steps towards a broader usage of such methods is given.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Controllable Diversity in Normalization-Based Implicit Ensembles via Softmax-Temperature Modulation

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    Softmax-temperature regularisation of sigmoid-bounded normalisation scales controls member diversity in implicit ensembles, matching deep ensembles cheaply across CNNs and transformers.

  2. Vulnerability-Aware Alignment: Mitigating Uneven Forgetting in Harmful Fine-Tuning

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Vulnerability-Aware Alignment splits safety training data into fragile and robust groups, then uses group robust optimization and adversarial perturbations, cutting harmful response rates after harmful fine-tuning by ...

  3. Uncertainty Unveiled: Can Exposure to More In-context Examples Mitigate Uncertainty for Large Language Models?

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Giving LLMs more in-context examples reduces predictive uncertainty, mainly by lowering epistemic uncertainty, and often improves accuracy.

  4. Deep Learning-Based BMD Estimation from Radiographs with Conformal Uncertainty Quantification

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Deep learning predicts BMD from knee radiographs with Pearson R=0.68 and conformal intervals that approximate nominal coverage, but anatomical mismatch and data limitations block clinical use.

Pith tools