Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Manifold Hypothesis in Data Analysis: Double Geometrically-Probabilistic Approach to Manifold Dimension Estimation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.03903 v1 pith:Q6DJLR3S submitted 2021-07-08 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords manifolddatadimensionhypothesisapproachmethodmethodsdifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Manifold hypothesis states that data points in high-dimensional space actually lie in close vicinity of a manifold of much lower dimension. In many cases this hypothesis was empirically verified and used to enhance unsupervised and semi-supervised learning. Here we present new approach to manifold hypothesis checking and underlying manifold dimension estimation. In order to do it we use two very different methods simultaneously - one geometric, another probabilistic - and check whether they give the same result. Our geometrical method is a modification for sparse data of a well-known box-counting algorithm for Minkowski dimension calculation. The probabilistic method is new. Although it exploits standard nearest neighborhood distance, it is different from methods which were previously used in such situations. This method is robust, fast and includes special preliminary data transformation. Experiments on real datasets show that the suggested approach based on two methods combination is powerful and effective.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Survey of Dimension Estimation Methods

    stat.ML 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A broad benchmark of intrinsic dimension estimators shows that no single method or set of hyperparameters works across datasets, and tuned benchmark scores frequently indicate overfitting rather than transferable accuracy.

Pith tools