Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Training

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.07075 v2 pith:7EC52GAZ submitted 2021-07-15 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords trainingscoresdataexamplesimportantdatasetsearlyel2n
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent success in deep learning has partially been driven by training increasingly overparametrized networks on ever larger datasets. It is therefore natural to ask: how much of the data is superfluous, which examples are important for generalization, and how do we find them? In this work, we make the striking observation that, in standard vision datasets, simple scores averaged over several weight initializations can be used to identify important examples very early in training. We propose two such scores -- the Gradient Normed (GraNd) and the Error L2-Norm (EL2N) scores -- and demonstrate their efficacy on a range of architectures and datasets by pruning significant fractions of training data without sacrificing test accuracy. In fact, using EL2N scores calculated a few epochs into training, we can prune half of the CIFAR10 training set while slightly improving test accuracy. Furthermore, for a given dataset, EL2N scores from one architecture or hyperparameter configuration generalize to other configurations. Compared to recent work that prunes data by discarding examples that are rarely forgotten over the course of training, our scores use only local information early in training. We also use our scores to detect noisy examples and study training dynamics through the lens of important examples -- we investigate how the data distribution shapes the loss surface and identify subspaces of the model's data representation that are relatively stable over training.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GRAFT: Gradient-Aware Fast MaxVol Technique for Dynamic Data Sampling

    cs.LG 2025-08 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    GRAFT selects diverse training samples per batch via fast MaxVol on low-rank features and dynamically tunes the sample count using gradient projection error, claiming near-full accuracy at reduced compute and emissions.

  2. Less Data, Faster Convergence: Goal-Driven Data Optimization for Multimodal Instruction Tuning

    cs.CV 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    Goal-driven selection of 1× multimodal instruction subsets reaches a 512k Uni-10x baseline after ~27–35k samples and improves accuracy by up to +3.08 pp under a fixed Qwen3-VL recipe.

  3. VisNec: Measuring and Leveraging Visual Necessity for Multimodal Instruction Tuning

    cs.CV 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Selecting instruction-tuning samples by the loss difference between text-only and multimodal prediction (VisNec) lets a model match or exceed full-data performance with only 15% of the data.

  4. Quality over Quantity: An Effective Large-Scale Data Reduction Strategy Based on Pointwise V-Information

    cs.LG 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A PVI-based data reduction and progressive training strategy is applied to Chinese NLI, but the reported small accuracy declines do not match the experimental tables.

Pith tools