Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Learning to Price against a Budget and ROI Constrained Buyer

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.07725 v2 pith:QZOJWS2Q submitted 2021-07-16 cs.GT

classification cs.GT
keywords sellerbuyeralgorithmbudgetpricelearningbestconstrained
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Internet advertisers (buyers) repeatedly procure ad impressions from ad platforms (sellers) with the aim to maximize total conversion (i.e. ad value) while respecting both budget and return-on-investment (ROI) constraints for efficient utilization of limited monetary resources. Facing such a constrained buyer who aims to learn her optimal strategy to acquire impressions, we study from a seller's perspective how to learn and price ad impressions through repeated posted price mechanisms to maximize revenue. For this two-sided learning setup, we propose a learning algorithm for the seller that utilizes an episodic binary-search procedure to identify a revenue-optimal selling price. We show that such a simple learning algorithm enjoys low seller regret when within each episode, the budget and ROI constrained buyer approximately best responds to the posted price. We present simple yet natural buyer's bidding algorithms under which the buyer approximately best responds while satisfying budget and ROI constraints, leading to a low regret for our proposed seller pricing algorithm. The design of our seller algorithm is motivated by the fact that the seller's revenue function admits a bell-shaped structure when the buyer best responds to prices under budget and ROI constraints, enabling our seller algorithm to identify revenue-optimal selling prices efficiently.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Online Bidding Algorithms with Strict Return on Spend (ROS) Constraint

    cs.GT 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Strictly satisfying the return-on-spend constraint in online auto-bidding forces linear regret; a near-optimal algorithm exists only for constant values and threshold auctions.

  2. On the Coordination of Value-Maximizing Bidders

    cs.GT 2025-11 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Letting only the highest-value auto-bidder compete improves both RoS compliance and total value compared with independent bidding, for overbidding and mirror-descent bidders.

Pith tools