Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Understanding Gender and Racial Disparities in Image Recognition Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.09211 v1 pith:R66FZ4A7 submitted 2021-07-20 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords datasetmodelclassificationcross-entropydisparitiesdistributionalgenderimage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large scale image classification models trained on top of popular datasets such as Imagenet have shown to have a distributional skew which leads to disparities in prediction accuracies across different subsections of population demographics. A lot of approaches have been made to solve for this distributional skew using methods that alter the model pre, post and during training. We investigate one such approach - which uses a multi-label softmax loss with cross-entropy as the loss function instead of a binary cross-entropy on a multi-label classification problem on the Inclusive Images dataset which is a subset of the OpenImages V6 dataset. We use the MR2 dataset, which contains images of people with self-identified gender and race attributes to evaluate the fairness in the model outcomes and try to interpret the mistakes by looking at model activations and suggest possible fixes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bridging the Data Provenance Gap Across Text, Speech and Video

    cs.AI 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A manual audit of nearly 4,000 text, speech, and video datasets finds AI training data increasingly comes from web and social media sources, carries hidden non-commercial restrictions, and remains Western-centric with...

Pith tools