Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A hierarchical prior for generalized linear models based on predictions for the mean response

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.11195 v1 pith:KI7QR6N3 submitted 2021-07-23 stat.ME

A hierarchical prior for generalized linear models based on predictions for the mean response

classification stat.ME
keywords priorhierarchicallinearpredictionpredictionsconjugatedatadevelop
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

There has been increased interest in using prior information in statistical analyses. For example, in rare diseases, it can be difficult to establish treatment efficacy based solely on data from a prospective study due to low sample sizes. To overcome this issue, an informative prior for the treatment effect may be elicited. We develop a novel extension of the conjugate prior of Chen and Ibrahim (2003) that enables practitioners to elicit a prior prediction for the mean response for generalized linear models, treating the prediction as random. We refer to the hierarchical prior as the hierarchical prediction prior. For i.i.d. settings and the normal linear model, we derive cases for which the hyperprior is a conjugate prior. We also develop an extension of the HPP in situations where summary statistics from a previous study are available, drawing comparisons with the power prior. The HPP allows for discounting based on the quality of individual level predictions, having the potential to provide efficiency gains (e.g., lower MSE) where predictions are incompatible with the data. An efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm is developed. Applications illustrate that inferences under the HPP are more robust to prior-data conflict compared to selected non-hierarchical priors.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.