REVIEW 1 cited by
Theoretical Study and Comparison of SPSA and RDSA Algorithms
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Stochastic approximation (SA) algorithms are widely used in system optimization problems when only noisy measurements of the system are available. This paper studies two types of SA algorithms in a multivariate Kiefer-Wolfowitz setting: random-direction SA (RDSA) and simultaneous-perturbation SA (SPSA), and then describes the bias term, convergence, and asymptotic normality of RDSA algorithms. The gradient estimations in RDSA and SPSA have different forms and, consequently, use different types of random perturbations. This paper looks at various valid distributions for perturbations in RDSA and SPSA and then compares the two algorithms using mean-square errors computed from asymptotic distribution. From both a theoretical and numerical point of view, we find that SPSA generally outperforms RDSA.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Zeroth-Order Langevin Monte Carlo via SPSA under Noisy Function Measurements
LMC-SPSA, using two noisy function evaluations per iteration, is claimed to converge in W2 distance with an O(p^2) dimension bound and O(p/epsilon^2 + delta^2 p^3/epsilon^3) oracle complexity.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.