Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Detecting Abusive Albanian

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.13592 v3 pith:3QXRNL7G submitted 2021-07-28 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords offensivespeechscorealbaniancontentdatasethateidentification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The ever growing usage of social media in the recent years has had a direct impact on the increased presence of hate speech and offensive speech in online platforms. Research on effective detection of such content has mainly focused on English and a few other widespread languages, while the leftover majority fail to have the same work put into them and thus cannot benefit from the steady advancements made in the field. In this paper we present \textsc{Shaj}, an annotated Albanian dataset for hate speech and offensive speech that has been constructed from user-generated content on various social media platforms. Its annotation follows the hierarchical schema introduced in OffensEval. The dataset is tested using three different classification models, the best of which achieves an F1 score of 0.77 for the identification of offensive language, 0.64 F1 score for the automatic categorization of offensive types and lastly, 0.52 F1 score for the offensive language target identification.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Web(er) of Hate: A Survey on How Hate Speech Is Typed

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Hate speech datasets vary because curators hold different ideal types of hate, so the field should document those assumptions instead of chasing a single definition.

  2. HatePRISM: Policies, Platforms, and Research Integration. Advancing NLP for Hate Speech Proactive Mitigation

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A tri-partite survey finds that hate speech definitions and moderation practices in country laws, platform policies, and NLP datasets are largely misaligned, and calls for a unified proactive moderation framework.

Pith tools