REVIEW 2 cited by
Detecting Abusive Albanian
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The ever growing usage of social media in the recent years has had a direct impact on the increased presence of hate speech and offensive speech in online platforms. Research on effective detection of such content has mainly focused on English and a few other widespread languages, while the leftover majority fail to have the same work put into them and thus cannot benefit from the steady advancements made in the field. In this paper we present \textsc{Shaj}, an annotated Albanian dataset for hate speech and offensive speech that has been constructed from user-generated content on various social media platforms. Its annotation follows the hierarchical schema introduced in OffensEval. The dataset is tested using three different classification models, the best of which achieves an F1 score of 0.77 for the identification of offensive language, 0.64 F1 score for the automatic categorization of offensive types and lastly, 0.52 F1 score for the offensive language target identification.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Web(er) of Hate: A Survey on How Hate Speech Is Typed
Hate speech datasets vary because curators hold different ideal types of hate, so the field should document those assumptions instead of chasing a single definition.
-
HatePRISM: Policies, Platforms, and Research Integration. Advancing NLP for Hate Speech Proactive Mitigation
A tri-partite survey finds that hate speech definitions and moderation practices in country laws, platform policies, and NLP datasets are largely misaligned, and calls for a unified proactive moderation framework.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.